USPTO serial 74592722
DIRECT CONNECTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HINES, CARYN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DIRECT CONNECTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Glendale Heights, IL
Glendale Heights, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bryan K. Wheelock
BRYAN K WHEELOCK ARMSTRONG, TEASDALE, SCHLAFLY ET ALONE METROPOLITAN SQ STE 2600ST LOUIS, MO 63102-2740UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | wholesale distributorships of electrical and communications equipment | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 1999 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 16, 1999 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 16, 1999 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 21, 1999 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 22, 1999 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Sep 22, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 8, 1998 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 16, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 14, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 6, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 15, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 10, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 31, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 21, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |