Drawing for CENTILLION DATA SYSTEMS

USPTO serial 74594548

CENTILLION DATA SYSTEMS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
HERMAN, RUSS
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with CENTILLION DATA SYSTEMS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark Hellmann

MARK H HELLMAN HOLLEB & COFF55 E MONROE ST STE 4100CHICAGO, IL 60603UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009business computer programs and instructional manuals therefor sold together in the fields of billing, telephone communications, record analysis, information transfers, wireless communications and multi-media communicationsACTIVENov 2, 1994
035data processing and business consulting services in the field of telephone communications, featuring billing, information transfers, wireless communications, multi-media communications, record analysis and record maintenance servicesACTIVENov 2, 1994

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 3, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 3, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 26, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 23, 2000SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Aug 9, 2000IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Apr 11, 2000EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 10, 2000EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 10, 1999NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 18, 1999PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 16, 1999NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 25, 1999CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 19, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 1, 1995CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 20, 1995CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 15, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 18, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 18, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 31, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance