USPTO serial 74594712
ULIT ULTRAFAST LASER IMAGING TECHNOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DONINGER, CHRISTOPHER G
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ULIT ULTRAFAST LASER IMAGING TECHNOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Solon B. Kemon
SOLON B KEMON SHLESINGER, ARKWRIGHT & GARVEY3000 S EADS STARLINGTON, VA 22202UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Computer Tomography (CT) laser scanner for medical diagnostic use | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by IMAGING DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by IMAGING DIAGNOSTIC SYSTEMS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named ULIT ULTRAFAST LASER IMAGING TECHNOLOGY
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 21, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 21, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 3, 1998 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 18, 1998 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 31, 1997 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 19, 1997 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 27, 1997 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jun 10, 1997 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 5, 1997 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 6, 1997 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 10, 1997 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 8, 1996 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 21, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 23, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 28, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 5, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 4, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 9, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 1, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 3, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |