USPTO serial 74598896
ROYAL JELLY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODMAN, CHERYL SUZANNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ROYAL JELLY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Woodland Hills, CA
Studio City, CA
Granada Hills, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
HYMEN DIAMOND
4409 RUTH DRMONROEVILLE, PA 15146UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | live musical and other performances and of the recording of phonorecords such as cassettes and compact discs | ABANDONED | Aug 4, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Edwards, John Douglas
- Other trademarks owned by Steigerwald, Daniel
- Other trademarks owned by Klaven, Jeffrey
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named ROYAL JELLY
- Prosecution event ABN2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 12, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 8, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 24, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 28, 1994 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |