USPTO serial 74598964
SNOOZY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2919173Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 18, 2005
- Examiner
- OH, WON TEAK
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SNOOZY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Anjou, Quebec, CA
WORLD ACCORDING TO SNOOZY CORPORATION, THE
Anjou, Quebec H1J 1K8, CA
Other trademarks owned by WORLD ACCORDING TO SNOOZY CORPORATION, THE
WORLD ACCORDING TO SNOOZY CORPORATION, THE
Anjou, Quebec H1J 1K8, CA
Other trademarks owned by WORLD ACCORDING TO SNOOZY CORPORATION, THE
Saint-Laurent, Quebec, CA
Anjou, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Janet F. Satterthwaite
Janet F. Satterthwaite Potomac Law Group PLLC1300 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 700Washington, DC 20004UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PRIVA, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by WORLD ACCORDING TO SNOOZY CORPORATION, THE
- Other trademarks owned by WORLD ACCORDING TO SNOOZY CORPORATION, THE
- Other trademarks owned by FIBERLINKS TEXTILES INC.
- Other trademarks owned by PRIVA, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named SNOOZY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 1, 2025 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 18, 2024 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2018 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 31, 2018 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2018 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2018 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 8, 2017 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Nov 8, 2017 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2015 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2015 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Feb 2, 2015 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 31, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 16, 2015 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2011 | C15P | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 17, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2011 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 15, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 15, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 18, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 9, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 14, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 5, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2003 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| May 27, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 27, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 29, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 6, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 17, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 20, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 6, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 9, 2001 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2000 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 8, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 8, 1999 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 19, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 16, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 2, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 27, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |