USPTO serial 74599737
REVENGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LEVINE, HOWARD B
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with REVENGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Stanmore, Middlesex HA7 4NW, GB
Stanmore, Middlesex HA7 4NW, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark Harrison
MARK HARRISON SPENCER & FRANKSTE 300 E1100 NEW YORK AVE N WWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3955Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | medical preparations, namely analgesics, stomach remedies, laxatives, antidiarrheals, cough and cold remedies, hay fever remedy, vitamin supplements, skin care products, sleep and travel sickness remedies, smoking cessation, ear and eye care products, foot care products, hair and scalp products, hemorrhoidal products, mouth care products, urinary tract products | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 1, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 3, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 30, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |