USPTO serial 74599838
PRO LUBE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2036378Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 11, 1997
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, JYLL
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PRO LUBE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
PROGRESSIVE COMPONENTS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
WAUCONDA, IL
Other trademarks owned by PROGRESSIVE COMPONENTS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
Wauconda, IL
Wauconda, IL
Wauconda, IL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas H. Pauley
Douglas H. Pauley Pauley Petersen & Erickson2800 W. Higgins RoadSuite 365Hoffman Estates, IL 60169Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 004 | solid lubricious coating, namely, chromium, applied to metal components of injection molds to eliminate the need for liquid lubrication | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jul 7, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by PROGRESSIVE COMPONENTS INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by D & L Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by D & L Incorporated
- Other trademarks owned by D & L Incorporated
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Similar marks named PRO LUBE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 2020 | C8.T | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR) | — |
| Jan 20, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 20, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Mar 23, 2007 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 23, 2007 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 23, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Feb 12, 2007 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 30, 2003 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jan 10, 2003 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 11, 1997 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 19, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 18, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 5, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 27, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 1996 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 8, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 28, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 3, 1996 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 15, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 29, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 9, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |