USPTO serial 74601390
WORKFORCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WORKFORCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
EDWARD H RENNER
EDWARD H RENNER HUSCH & EPPENBERGER LLC100 N BROADWAY STE 1300ST LOUIS, MO 63102-2789UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | temporary and permanent personnel placement services | ACTIVE | Jul 19, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2000 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 28, 2000 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 2, 1999 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| May 18, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 10, 1999 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 10, 1999 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 19, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 12, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 10, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 21, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 3, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 31, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 4, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |