USPTO serial 74601908
AMORE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2468046Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 10, 2001
- Examiner
- RUPP, TERRY
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with AMORE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SEOUL, KR
Seoul, KR
Seoul, KR
Seoul, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Meyer A. Gross
Meyer A. Gross Schweitzer Cornman Gross & Bondell LLP292 Madison Avenue19th FloorNew York, NY 10017Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | perfumes, cosmetic skin creams, cosmetic skin lotions, skin cleansing creams, massage creams, essential oils for personal use, lipsticks, eye shadow, make-up powder, make-up foundation, face powder sold in compacts, hair lotions and hair oils | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AMOREPACIFIC CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by Pacific Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Pacific Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Pacific Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named AMORE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2012 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| May 17, 2007 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 12, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2007 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 10, 2001 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 16, 2001 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 13, 2001 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 22, 2001 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Dec 30, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 6, 2000 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 21, 1999 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 19, 1999 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 14, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 20, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 16, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 13, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 1996 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 1, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 1996 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 18, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 11, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |