Drawing for MIZAR

USPTO serial 74602733

MIZAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FIRST, VIVIAN M
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MIZAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey R. Kuester

Jeffrey R. Kuester Taylor English Duma LLP1600 Parkwood Circle, Suite 400Atlanta, GA 30339UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
004gas fireplace logsABANDONED—
011portable gas stoves and water heaters, namely spa heaters, pool heaters and domestic water heatersABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 16, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 16, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 17, 2010TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 9, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 9, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 2, 2010CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 2, 2010COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 1999ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 28, 1998EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 13, 1998EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jan 15, 1998EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 24, 1997EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jun 26, 1997EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
May 29, 1997EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 12, 1996EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 23, 1996EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 13, 1996EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 2, 1996EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 19, 1995NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 26, 1995PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 25, 1995NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 17, 1995CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 13, 1995CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 1, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 15, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance