USPTO serial 74603071
MERCURI URVAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2205933Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 24, 1998
- Examiner
- ALT, JILL
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with MERCURI URVAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
1071 DV AMSTERDAM, NL
S-111 43 Stockholm, SE
S-111 43 Stockholm, SE
AMSTERDAM, NL
STOCKHOLM, SE
MSIDA MSD 1703, MT
MSIDA MSD 1703, MT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard J. McKenna
Richard J. McKenna Foley & Lardner LLP777 E. Wisconsin AvenueMilwaukee, WI 53202-5306UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | advertising services, namely, preparing advertisements for others; assistance in employment and recruitment of personnel and staff; business appraisals; business consultancy; business information; business enquiries; business investigations; business management assistance; business management consultancy; business organization consultancy; and business research | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 1981 |
| 042 | testing to determine employment skills, namely, selection and judgment of individuals' fitness for professions, jobs or work, judgment of personality and personal qualities, elaboration of programs and methods for individual and leadership development, and making surveys of competence and capacity in organizations, companies and with individual staff members | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 1981 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by HERCONEL INTERNATIONAL B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by Mercuri Urval AB
- Other trademarks owned by Mercuri Urval AB
- Other trademarks owned by HERCONEL INTERNATIONAL B.V.
- Other trademarks owned by MERCURI URVAL KMR AB
- Other trademarks owned by HERCONEL LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by HERCONEL LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named MERCURI URVAL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 22, 2021 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 24, 2017 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2017 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 3, 2017 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 25, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 25, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 11, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 4, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 28, 2008 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Sep 5, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 3, 2008 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 26, 2004 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| May 19, 2004 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| May 19, 2004 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 24, 1998 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 18, 1998 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 18, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 4, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 24, 1998 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 25, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Sep 8, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 25, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 19, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 18, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 21, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 30, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 6, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 28, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |