USPTO serial 74603126
COMP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KLINE, MATTHEW
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with COMP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott K. Haight
SCOTT K HAIGHT HEISKELL, DONELSON, BEARMAN, ET AL2000 FIRST TENNESSEE BANK BLDGMEMPHIS, TN 38103UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | land motor vehicle engine parts, namely camshafts and valve train components such as valves and rods | ABANDONED | Mar 28, 1985 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 1997 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 3, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 1997 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 30, 1997 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jun 26, 1997 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Jan 16, 1997 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 27, 1996 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 27, 1996 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 25, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 21, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 27, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 14, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |