USPTO serial 74603483
ECOTEC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GLYNN, GERALD
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ECOTEC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
96100 Siracusa, IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce W. McKee
BRUCE W MCKEE ZARLEY, MCKEE THOMTE, VOORHEES & SEASE801 GRAND AVE - STE 3200DES MOINES, IA 50309-2721UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | machines and machine tools; motors and engines (except for land vehicles); machine couplings and transmission belts (except for land vehicles); agricultural implements; incubators for eggs; apparatus and plants for centrifugation | ABANDONED | — |
| 009 | weighing, measuring and checking (supervision) systems | ABANDONED | — |
| 011 | apparatus for lighting, heating, steam generating, cooking, refrigeration, drying, ventilating, water supply and sanitary purposes | ABANDONED | — |
| 040 | apparatus and plants for the treatment of materials, depurating plants and apparatus decontaminating apparatus and plants, disposal, drying and recycling apparatus and plants and apparatus for land recovery, treatment of materials such as industrial sludges, industrial wastes, pulps, depuration of waters, drying of products | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 23, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 23, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 26, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 12, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 14, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |