USPTO serial 74603861
CELLTECH THERAPEUTICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHOS, JOHN E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CELLTECH THERAPEUTICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SLOUGH BERKSHIRE, SL1 4EN, GB
SLOUGH BERKSHIRE, SL1 4EN, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ronald A. Sandler
RONALD A SANDLER JONES, DAY, REAVIS & POGUE77 W WACKERCHICAGO, IL 60601-1692UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | diagnostic reagents, bacteriological cultures, imaging and immunopurification agents, and assay reagents, all for medical diagnostic use, and pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of inflammatory disease, autoimmune, immunomodulatory disease, cancer, respiratory and cardiovascular diseases, viral and infectious diseases, neurological diseases and diseases of the central nervous system | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | research and development of pharmaceuticals, diagnostic reagents and chemicals and consulting services related thereto | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by CELLTECH THERAPEUTICS LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by CELLTECH THERAPEUTICS LIMITED
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CELLTECH THERAPEUTICS
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 1999 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 12, 1999 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 1999 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 19, 1998 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 30, 1998 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 9, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 30, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 14, 1997 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 30, 1997 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 30, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 30, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 30, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 7, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 5, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 15, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 13, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 12, 1996 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 2, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 6, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 6, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 17, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |