USPTO serial 74603888
STARS & STRIPES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STRZYZ, KAREN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with STARS & STRIPES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Columbus, GA
TORONATO, ONTARIO, CA
TORONATO, ONTARIO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Norm D. St. Landau
DRINKER BIDDLE & REATH LLPNORM D ST LANDAU1500 K ST NW STE 1100WASHINGTON, DC 20005-1209Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | ICED TEA | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BCB USA Corp.
- Other trademarks owned by COTT CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by COTT CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named STARS & STRIPES
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 14, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 16, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 17, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 27, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 3, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 1, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 3, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 26, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 29, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 6, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 17, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 14, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 8, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 2, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 24, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 1, 1999 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 7, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 14, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 15, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 22, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 9, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 5, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |