USPTO serial 74604605
ZOTE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 607
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AURINI, GEOFFREY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ZOTE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Croydon, Surrey CR9 3AL, GB
Croydon, Surrey CR9 3AL, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark H. Sparrow
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY GROUP GRAHAM & JAMES LLP885 3RD AVE 24TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10022-4834UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | artificial and synthetic resins for use in the manufacture of expanded foam materials; plastic molding compounds in the form of powders, liquids or pastes for use in the manufacture of molded plastic articles, plastic sheets and plastic films | ABANDONED | — |
| 017 | plastic in the form of sheets, blocks, films, rods, tubes, pipes and shaped sections, all for use in manufacturing; non-metallic expansion seals | ABANDONED | — |
| 019 | non-metallic expansion sealants for asphalt; non-metallic expansion sealants for roofing; expanded foam materials for use in the construction of buildings, roads and civil engineering structures | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 1999 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Jan 14, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 1998 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 29, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 10, 1997 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 16, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 9, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 15, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 16, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 23, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 22, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 27, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 30, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |