Drawing for INTELLPNEUMATIK

USPTO serial 74606715

INTELLPNEUMATIK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2360455Status 711
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Jun 20, 2000
Examiner
BAXLEY,ANDREW P
Law office
POST REGISTRATION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INTELLPNEUMATIK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Herbert Dubno

HERBERT DUBNO KARL F ROSS, PC5676 RIVERDALE AVE BOX 900RIVERDALE (BRONX), NY 10471-0900UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007machine parts, namely, pneumatic valves, cylinders and pistons; pneumatic controls for industrial machines and machine tools; electrical valves being parts of machines; industrial robotsSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDJan 31, 2000
009laboratory robots and electrical controls therefore; electrical controls for industrial robots; touch activated electrical switches; touch activated switches being parts of electrical controls; electrical power supply modules; solenoid valves; automatic valves for use on printed circuit boards; valve and pulse magnets; sensors for detecting or measuring temperature, pressure, humidity, voltage, electrical current; air and water sensors; sensors for detecting human proximity; liquid flow and level sensors; timers for controlling industrial machines and machine toolsSECTION 7(e) - CANCELLEDJan 31, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 24, 2005C7..CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL—
Feb 11, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 27, 2005AMD7SEC 7 REQUEST FILED—
Jan 27, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2000R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Apr 12, 2000CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Apr 11, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 11, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 11, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 10, 2000SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 4, 2000EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 14, 2000IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Feb 7, 2000EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Aug 27, 1999EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 2, 1999EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 27, 1999EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 10, 1999EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 11, 1998NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 19, 1998PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 17, 1998NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 12, 1998CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 13, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 9, 1997CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 8, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 3, 1997UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 5, 1997CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 17, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 20, 1996CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 27, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 8, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 2, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 16, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 25, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance