USPTO serial 74607513
VICTORIAN VILLAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 1, 1997
- Examiner
- DUBOIS, SUSAN L
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with VICTORIAN VILLAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Lubbock, TX
AMES MERCHANDISING CORPORATION
ROCKY HILL, CT
Dallas, TX
Lubbock, TX
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DEBORAH M LODGE
Jeffrey M. Furr Furr Law Firm2622 Debolt RoadUtica, OH 43080UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | electric lighted plastic decorations for use on tabletops | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 28, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Gary Products Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by AMES MERCHANDISING CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by BRANDED LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Gary Products Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Similar marks named VICTORIAN VILLAGE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 27, 2014 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 21, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | PRAN | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Apr 2, 2002 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Apr 2, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 3, 2000 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 2, 2000 | CAND | CANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 25, 1998 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 1, 1997 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Dec 24, 1996 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 24, 1996 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 30, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 27, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 5, 1996 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 23, 1996 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 1996 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Feb 21, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 18, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 24, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |