USPTO serial 74607814
D-E-C-O-R
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LYKOS, ANGELA
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with D-E-C-O-R?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Paul R. A. Burke
PAUL R A BURKE PATENT DEPT SP-FR-2-12CORNING INCORPORATEDCORNING, NY 14831UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 021 | non-electric metal cookware, namely stainless steel skillets, frying pans, saucepans, dutch ovens and stockpots | ABANDONED | Feb 28, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 1997 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 16, 1997 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 16, 1997 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Oct 15, 1996 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 1996 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 24, 1996 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 3, 1996 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 23, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 18, 1995 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 7, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 10, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 5, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |