USPTO serial 74608270
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHRISTINA L MARTINI
KRISTIN J ACHTERHOF KATTEN MUCHIN & ZAVIS525 W MONROE STSTE 1600CHICAGO, IL 60661-3693| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | personnel management consultation services, namely, employee staffing services, temporary employment agency services and personnel staffing management services | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Oct 19, 1994 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2002 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Oct 24, 2002 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 15, 2002 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 3, 1998 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 5, 1997 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 13, 1997 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| May 27, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 1997 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 3, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 15, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 23, 1995 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 26, 1995 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 14, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 30, 1995 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 2, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |