USPTO serial 74608376
OMEROS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MANDIR, FREDERICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OMEROS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marcia S. Kelbon
MARCIA S KELBON CHRISTENSEN, O'CONNOR, JOHNSON, ET AL1420 FIFTH AVESTE 2800SEATTLE, WA 98101-2347Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | pharmaceuticals, namely surgical and burn management irrigation solutions containing pharmacologic agents for the inhibition of pain, swelling and inflammation; intravascular irrigation solutions containing pharmacologic agents for the inhibition of vasospasm and restonosis | ACTIVE | — |
| 010 | medical apparatus, namely implantable devices for the repair of tendons, ligaments and nerves | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Omeros Medical Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Omeros Medical Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named OMEROS
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2000 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 30, 1999 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 5, 1999 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Oct 23, 1998 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 5, 1998 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Apr 25, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 16, 1998 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 8, 1997 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 3, 1997 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Apr 15, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 6, 1997 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 19, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 27, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 26, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 21, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 16, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 30, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 26, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |