USPTO serial 74608554
VIATRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MANDIR, FREDERICK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VIATRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Cleveland, OH
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Walter C. Danison, Jr.
WALTER C DANISON JR BENESCH, FRIEDLANDER, COPLAN & ARONOFF2300 BP AMERICA BLDG200 PUBLIC SQCLEVELAND, OH 44114-2378Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | medical apparatus and instruments, namely arthroscope accessories, endoscope cleaning accessories, endoscopic brush, operating room scrub brush, medical device cleaner, laproscope cover, tourniquet cuff cover, tourniquet curr, disinfector suction canister, disposable surgical cover, disposable urological drape, fluid encapsulator, ac-powered endoscope, ac-powered endoscope accessories, infection control laundry bag, endoscope sterilizer, endoscope washer, in-line gravity feed disinfecting units for decontaminating virus-infected body fluids, in-line disinfecting units for decontaminating virus-infected body fluids, sterilization units for medical instruments, and disinfection units for medical insturments, for protection from infection, cross-contamination, and detection of infectious matter | ABANDONED | Dec 5, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 1996 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Mar 1, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 22, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 14, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 14, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |