USPTO serial 74608755
IMAGE ART
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GOODMAN, CHERYL SUZANNE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IMAGE ART?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark I. Peroff
MARK I PEROFF TRADEMARK COUNSELORS OF AMERICA PC915 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10010UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer printers; data terminals; computers; magnetic discs containing computer programs in the field of document, image and data processing; magnetic diskettes containing computer programs in the field of document, image and data processing; magnetic tapes containing computer programs in the field of document, image and data processing; laser discs containing computer programs in the field of document, image and data processing; optical scanners; graphics and database management computer software programs for digital mapping and geographic information processing; computer software programs for document scanning, graphics, and image processing management; photocopying machines; facsimiles | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 12, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 9, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 1996 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Mar 28, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 23, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 3, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |