USPTO serial 74609336
Serial No. 74609336
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- —
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with Serial No. 74609336?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bryan K. Wheelock
ANDREW B MAYFIELD ARMSTRONG, TEASDALE, SCHLAFLY & DAVISONE METROPOLITAN SQSTE 2600ST LOUIS, MO 63102-2740Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | distributorships featuring informational and training films and videos on healthcare subjects | ABANDONED | Oct 1, 1994 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 1997 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 5, 1997 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 5, 1997 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 14, 1997 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 19, 1997 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 20, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 13, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 20, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 19, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 22, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 13, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 18, 1996 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 1, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 16, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 1995 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 30, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 30, 1995 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 15, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 5, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |