USPTO serial 74609653
BC GETAWAYS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, DAVID T
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BC GETAWAYS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Burnaby, British Columbia, CA
Burnaby, British Columbia, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Douglas T. Johnson
DOUGLAS T JOHNSON MILLER & MARTINSTE 1000, VOLUNTEER BLDG832 GEORGIA AVECHATTANOOGA, TN 37402-2289Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | making hotel reservations for others | ACTIVE | Nov 19, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 10, 2001 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 30, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 29, 2000 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Dec 6, 1999 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 23, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 12, 1999 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 11, 1999 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 26, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 1999 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 23, 1998 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 1998 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 5, 1998 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 1998 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 3, 1997 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 11, 1997 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 13, 1997 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 21, 1997 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 23, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 25, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 2, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 1, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 23, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 22, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |