USPTO serial 74610117
HELVAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CRAWFORD, MARY
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HELVAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
FIN-00380 Helsinki, FI
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Bruce E. O'Connor
BRUCE E O'CONNOR CHRISTENSEN, O'CONNOR, JOHNSON, ET AL1420 FIFTH AVESTE 2800SEATTLE, VA 98101-2347Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electrical, integrated, and printed circuits and circuit boards, electric coils, circuit breakers, electrical conductors, connectors, controllers and converters, electric light switches and dimmers, electric switch plates, electromechanical controls for use in control of illumination, emergency warning lights, electric gate operators, motion sensitive switches, neon signs, photometers, electrical power supplies, semiconductor devices, electric switches, electronic touch sensitive switches, electrical transformers, voltage surge protectors and suppressors | ABANDONED | — |
| 011 | electric lighting fixtures, fluorescent lighting tubes, electric track lighting units, electric night lights, and sun lamps | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 24, 1997 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Aug 11, 1997 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 1997 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 3, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 5, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 10, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |