USPTO serial 74610175
YOUR SOURCE FOR SMART PARENTING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MOLINOFF, JEFFREY S.
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with YOUR SOURCE FOR SMART PARENTING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Terry L. Snow
TERRY L SNOW WORLD PUBLICATIONS II, LLCPO BOX 8500WINTER PARK, FL 92790UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | newspapers and magazines pertaining to child-rearing and parenting issues | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Meigher Communications
- Other trademarks owned by World Publications II, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by World Publications II, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named YOUR SOURCE FOR SMART PARENTING
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 2005 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 25, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 4, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 16, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 14, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 23, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 3, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 26, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 24, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 9, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2001 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 22, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 22, 2000 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Nov 22, 2000 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 13, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 8, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 21, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 18, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 1, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 1, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |