USPTO serial 74610481
JUICY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KREHELY, KIM
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with JUICY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark L. Skaist
MARK L SKAIST STRADLING, YOCCA, CARLSON & RAUTH660 NEWPORT CTR DR STE 1600NEWPORT BEACH, CA 92660UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | clothing, namely shirts, dresses, pants, skirts and jackets | ABANDONED | Oct 30, 1996 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 1998 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| May 15, 1998 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 8, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 1997 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Feb 21, 1997 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Feb 20, 1997 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 12, 1996 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 19, 1996 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 20, 1996 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 28, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 27, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 14, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 6, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 16, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |