USPTO serial 74610525
EXPRESSVU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MULLEN, MARK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EXPRESSVU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
MONTREAL, QUEBEC, CA
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Montreal, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DONALD L DENNISON
DONALD L DENNISON DENNISON MESEROLE POLLACK & SCHEINER612 CRYSTAL SQ 41745 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWYARLINGTON, VA 22202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | communication services, namely radio and television broadcasting, and satellite television transmission services in the nature of non-programming information and interactive television services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BELL EXPRESSVU INC.
- Other trademarks owned by EXPRESSVU INC.
- Other trademarks owned by EXPRESSVU INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Similar marks named EXPRESSVU
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 9, 2001 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 28, 2000 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2000 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 2000 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 24, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 24, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 19, 1999 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 29, 1999 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 29, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 3, 1998 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 5, 1997 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 5, 1997 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 29, 1995 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 13, 1995 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 24, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 24, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 22, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 7, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 18, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 24, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |