USPTO serial 74610551
PODITECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MICHOS, JOHN E
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PODITECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
SHERIDAN NEIMARK
SHERIDAN NEIMARK BROWDY AND NEIMARK419 SEVENTH ST NW STE 300WASHINGTON, DC 20004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | orthopedic soles and shoes | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 19, 1998 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 12, 1997 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Sep 12, 1997 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Dec 9, 1996 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 24, 1996 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 1996 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 17, 1996 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 7, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 21, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 5, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 8, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |