Drawing for Serial No. 74610820

USPTO serial 74610820

Serial No. 74610820

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
—
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 74610820?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Catherine J. Yates

CATHERINE J YATES KALISH AND GILSTER500 N BROADWAY STE 1200ST LOUIS, MO 63102UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007power operated diamond drilling rigs, rods and tools, namely cores, barrels, diamond drilling bits, reaming shells, circular saws, diamond wire and diamond coring bits; power operated diamond sawing and cutting machines and tools, namely cores, barrels, diamond drilling bits, reaming shells, circular saws, diamond wire and diamond coring bits; power operated vibratory rotary and rotary percussion drilling rigs, machines, tools, namely cores, barrels, diamond drilling bits, reaming shells, circular saws, diamond wire and diamond coring bits and cemented tungsten carbide structural parts thereof; high precision abrading and grinding machines and power operated tools, namely cores, barrels, diamond drilling bits, reaming shells, circular saws, diamond wire and diamond coring bits; cemented tungsten carbide component parts for mining and industrial applications for diamond synthesis, namely earth and rock drilling inserts for use on rotary and rotary/percussive rock drilling equipment, grinding burrs for use on metal pressing and deburring equipment and end mill rods for use on milling machines for metal removal in engineering and manufacturing work shopsABANDONED—
009instrumentation for measurement of moisture levels, compaction levels and permeability of soil, asphalt content of paving and ground settlement; and equipment in the nature of inclinometers and casings, electrolevel beam sensors, piezometers and extensometersABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 6, 1997EX1MSOU EXTENSION 1 DENIAL LETTER MAILED—
May 6, 1997EX1DSOU EXTENSION 1 DENIAL LETTER PREPARED—
Feb 21, 1997ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 20, 1997EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 20, 1996NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 28, 1996PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 26, 1996NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 1, 1996CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 21, 1996CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 24, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 14, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 15, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 4, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance