USPTO serial 74611316
THE COLLEGE BOARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ELSE, KEVIN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE COLLEGE BOARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sharon A. Zink
Sharon A. Zink The College Board45 Columbus AveLegal DepartmnetNew York, NY 10023Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer programs, CD-ROMS, video cassettes and audio cassettes for use in the field of education, namely student, parent and teacher guidance, college, graduate and post-graduate admission, college, graduate and post-graduate admission and placemate tests, financial aid for college and primary and secondary school curriculum | ABANDONED | — |
| 016 | publications, namely books, handbooks, pamphlets, periodicals, catalogues and brochures featuring information on education, namely student, parent and teacher guidance, college, graduate and post-graduate admission, college, graduate and post-graduate admission and placemate tests, financial aid for college and primary and secondary school curriculum | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 8, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 21, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 9, 1996 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Jan 3, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 1995 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 19, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 15, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |