Drawing for DOUBLE LOAD

USPTO serial 74611461

DOUBLE LOAD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FRAZIER, JEFFERY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DOUBLE LOAD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jerome Gilson

JEROME GILSON BRINKS HOFER GILSON & LIONEP O BOX 10395CHICAGO, IL 60610UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007dish washing machines, washing machines for clothes, garbage disposals and structural and replacement partsABANDONED—
011large domestic appliances, namely electric ranges, electric ovens, electric freezers, electric refrigerator-freezers, gas ranges, gas ovens, electric and gas clothes dryers, electric and gas stoves, refrigerated dispensing units for beverages, air conditioning units, microwave ovens for cooking, dehumidifiers, water coolers, humidifers, electrically driven barbecue units for electric stoves, and structural and replacement partsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 17, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 16, 1997ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jul 16, 1997EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Dec 31, 1996EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Oct 30, 1996EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 1, 1996CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 20, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 17, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 8, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance