USPTO serial 74611610
BRACCO GROUP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WARD, JOYCE A.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BRACCO GROUP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
20134 MILAN, IT
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Angelo Notaro
ANGELO NOTARO NOTARO 7 MICHALOS PCEMPIRE STATE BLDG350 FIFTH AVE STE 6902NEW YORK, NY 10118-6985Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | full line of pharmaceutical preparations and contrast imaging agents for medical use | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | scientific apparatus and instruments for laboratory use, namely for use in clinical chemistry and immunochemistry analysis on biological fluids | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | arranging and conducting educational conferences, congresses, seminars and symposiums in the field of immunochemistry | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 2, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 1997 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 30, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 29, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 11, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 30, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 26, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |