USPTO serial 74611930
LEAN GREEN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHIELDS, JULIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LEAN GREEN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John P. Passarelli
JOHN P PASSARELLI MCGRATH, N MULLIN & KRATZ, PC1400 ONE CENTRAL PARK PLZ222 S 15TH STOMAHA, NE 68102Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | prepared entrees, appetizers and side dishes consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry, vegetables, cheese and/or eggs or egg substitutes; fruit salads; garden salads; vegetables, salads; potato salad; chicken salad; tuna salad; crab salad, imitation crab salad; chili (with or without beans and/or meat); soup; luncheon meats; sausage and cheese | ABANDONED | — |
| 030 | prepared entrees, appetizers and side dishes consisting primarily of pasta or rice; pasta; macaroni salad; pasta salad; rice salad; bread; sandwiches; breakfast sandwiches; sauces; ice cream; pies; cookies; crackers; cakes; pudding; pizza and sweetened or flavored gelatin | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | restaurant services | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 1999 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 4, 1999 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 4, 1999 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 14, 1999 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 14, 1999 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 7, 1997 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 27, 1997 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 3, 1997 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 31, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 29, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 11, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 12, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 12, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 8, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 26, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |