Drawing for SIE-MED

USPTO serial 74611940

SIE-MED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SIE-MED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

DAN HITCHCOCK

DAN HITCHCOCK RICES, MCKENZIE & HERBERTSTE 29002 BLOOR ST ETORONTO, ON M4W 3J5

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010physical therapy equipment, namely electrical diagnostic apparatus and stimulator for diagnosis and therapy of atrophies and treatment of pain and iontophoresis; electrical stimulator for therapy of paralyses and disuse atrophies; electrical stimulator for treatment of pain, training of muscles and iontophoresis with stereodynamic interferential currents; electrical stimulator for treatment of pain and training muscles with duodynamic interference current; ultrasound apparatus for ultrasonic therapy, stimulation current therapy with diadynamic currents, and combined therapy of ultrasound with stimulation current; suction instrument for the rational electrode techniques; ultrasound equipment, namely ultrasound therapy unit designed for pure ultrasound therapy using continuous and pulsed ultrasound; and shortwave therapy apparatus for thermal and athermal physical therapy applications in the high-frequency fieldABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 29, 1997OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Oct 29, 1997OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Oct 29, 1997ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Nov 6, 1996OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
May 16, 1996ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Apr 30, 1996PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 29, 1996NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 15, 1996CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 7, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 28, 1995CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 28, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 17, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 1, 1995ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 1, 1995CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 26, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance