USPTO serial 74613011
D.E.T. DIRECT ENERGY TRANSFER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CARRUTHERS, SUE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with D.E.T. DIRECT ENERGY TRANSFER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Town of Mount Royal, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARK S SOMMERS
MARK S SOMMERS FINNEGAN HENDERSON FARABOW GARRETT ET AL1300 I ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20005-3315UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | sports articles for the practice of ice hockey, roller hockey and floor hockey, namely hockey sticks and replacement parts for these sticks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 8, 2000 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 27, 2000 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 25, 1999 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 19, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 20, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 1998 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 9, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 5, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 18, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 18, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |