USPTO serial 74613315
Serial No. 74613315
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 17, 1998
- Examiner
- FRONT, MITCHELL
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with Serial No. 74613315?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
BAKERS TRADING COMPANY OF AMERICA
New Westminster, British Columbia, CA
BAKERS TRADING COMPANY OF AMERICA
New Westminster, British Columbia, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NORMAN J.K. BISHOP
NORMAN JK BISHOP BISHOP & MCKENZIE LLP10104 -103 AVE STE 2500EDMONTON, AB T5J 1V3CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | bakery goods; dough for bakery goods; cookies; cookie batter | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jun 1, 1988 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21, 2008 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Oct 8, 2008 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE MAILED | — |
| May 3, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 28, 2003 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Oct 20, 2003 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2003 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 1998 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Dec 10, 1997 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 4, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 1997 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 21, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 21, 1997 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Apr 17, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 3, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 28, 1996 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 22, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 7, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 2, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 31, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |