USPTO serial 74613626
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
03100 Mexico D.F., MX
03100 Mexico D.F., MX
03100 Mexico D.F., MX
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Nestor F. Ho
NESTOR F HO FAEGRE & BENSON2200 NORWEST CTR90 S SEVENTH STMINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-3901| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | non-medicated additives for animal feed | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 14, 2007 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 11, 2000 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 11, 2000 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 30, 2000 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 5, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 24, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 22, 1999 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 22, 1999 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 22, 1999 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 22, 1999 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Feb 10, 1999 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 20, 1999 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 6, 1998 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 22, 1998 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 19, 1998 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 21, 1998 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 29, 1997 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 6, 1997 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 4, 1997 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 3, 1997 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 27, 1997 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 11, 1996 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 28, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 25, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 1, 1996 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Feb 26, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 20, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 21, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 22, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |