USPTO serial 74613767
THE ART OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WARD, JOYCE A.
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with THE ART OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marcy M. Lyles
JOSEPH D FINCHER HALL, ESTILL, HARDWICK, GABLE, GOLDEN &NELSON, PC320 S BOSTON AVE STE 400TULSA, OK 74103-3708Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | telephone communications services | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 26, 1997 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 26, 1997 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 26, 1997 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 7, 1996 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 3, 1996 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 25, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 24, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 28, 1996 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 27, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 27, 1996 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 26, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 23, 1996 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 22, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |