USPTO serial 74613810
MPEG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BILLINGS, JESSIE W
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MPEG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Tokyo, JP
G.C. Technology Kabushiki Kaisha
Tokyo, JP
G.C. Technology Kabushiki Kaisha
Tokyo, JP
Tokyo, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James P. Williams
JAMES P WILLIAMS LOEB & LOEB LLP1000 WILSHIRE BLVDSTE 1800LOS ANGELES, CA 90017Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | electrical communication apparatus and instruments, namely, interphones, manual telephone exchange apparatus, facsimile machines; television receivers, television transmitters, juke boxes, tape recorders, electric phonographs, record players, sound recording apparatus; video cameras, videodisc players, video recorders; electronic machines and instruments, namely, computers (including central processing units; programmed-data-carrying electronic circuits; blank magnetic disks; blank magnetic tapes), electron tubes, semi-conductor elements, electronic circuits (excluding those carrying computer programs); musical sound recordings, video screens, and video tapes, namely, pre-recorded video disks and tapes featuring pictures; protective helmets; video games machines for use with televisions | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | magazines, newsletters, and newspapers, and series of books, all on the subjects of entertainment, computers and other electronic machines, communications, and telecommunications | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | clothing for men, women, and children, namely, pants, jeans, skirts, shirts, T-shirts, vests, jackets, shorts, belts, sweaters, sweatshirts, sweatpants, hats, socks, liveries, jackets, suits, smocks, dress suits, overcoats, top coats, capes, raincoats, aprons, collar proctectors, gaiters, fur stoles, shawls, scarves, socks, covers, gloves, babies' diapers of textile, neckties, neckerchieves, mufflers, ear muffs, hoods, hats and caps, suspenders, braces, waistbands, belts, shoes, boots, and clog sandals | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | video game machines for personal and commercial use, namely, stand alone video game machines, and hand-held units for playing video games | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ascii Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by G.C. Technology Kabushiki Kaisha
- Other trademarks owned by G.C. Technology Kabushiki Kaisha
- Other trademarks owned by Ascii Corporation
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named MPEG
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2001 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 8, 2000 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 16, 2000 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 14, 2000 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 17, 1999 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 17, 1999 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 15, 1999 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 1999 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 1998 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 12, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 23, 1997 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 2, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 3, 1997 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 16, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 1996 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 18, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |