USPTO serial 74614173
OCCUSAVE COST CONTAINMENT LEADERS IN OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 607
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PEDERSEN, CHRIS A F
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OCCUSAVE COST CONTAINMENT LEADERS IN OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND PREVENTIVE MEDICINE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | medical services, satellite medical clinics and consultation services in the field of occupational health, environmental health and science, industrial hygiene, safety and preventive medicine; industrial hygiene, safety and environmental science services, namely recognition and evaluation of worksite and environmental hazards | ABANDONED | Jun 12, 1995 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Kanjarpane, Lavanya D.
- Other trademarks owned by Kanjarpane, Lavanya D.
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named OCCUSAVE COST CONTAINMENT LEADERS IN OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH AND PREVENTIVE MEDICINE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 1998 | ABN7 | ABANDONMENT - DEFECTIVE USE STATEMENT | — |
| Feb 12, 1998 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 11, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 3, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 16, 1998 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 12, 1997 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 17, 1997 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 13, 1996 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 31, 1996 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 6, 1996 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 5, 1995 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 12, 1995 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 11, 1995 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 26, 1995 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 14, 1995 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 31, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 12, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |