USPTO serial 74614437
GRUN 7
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MULLEN, MARK
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GRUN 7?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
AGRIFOODS INTERNATIONAL COOPERATIVE LTD.
Burnaby, British Columbia, CA
Other trademarks owned by AGRIFOODS INTERNATIONAL COOPERATIVE LTD.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JOHN A HUGHES
JOHN A HUGHES TOWNSEND AND TWONSEND AND CREW LLP2 EMBARCADERO CTR 8TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-3834UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | frozen confections and novelties, namely water ices, ice cream, ice milk, ice cream mix, milk shake mix, frosted malt mix, yogurt mix, frozen yogurt, sherbet and milk-based frozen confections in novelty forms and/or shapes | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 22, 1998 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 22, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 21, 1998 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 15, 1998 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 1997 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 1997 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 26, 1996 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 1995 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 6, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |