Drawing for DIGITAL MICROWAVE CORPORATION

USPTO serial 74614461

DIGITAL MICROWAVE CORPORATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ALT, JILL
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIGITAL MICROWAVE CORPORATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CARLA B OAKLEY

CARLA B OAKLEY MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP425 MARKET STSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2482UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009wireless communication systems, namely, digital modems, multiplexers, radio frequency units, antennas and related interfaces, all of which are used together to interconnect stations in mobile networks or provide local access to fiber optic telecommunications systems for voice, data or video services; network computer systems consisting of computer terminals and computer software for use in diagnostic monitoring, maintenance and control of such wireless communications systemsABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 14, 1999ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Apr 28, 1999CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 28, 1998CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 16, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 16, 1998DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 24, 1998CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 23, 1998CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 9, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 7, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 26, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 30, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 15, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 13, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 1, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 22, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 18, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance