Drawing for TAX OPPORTUNITIES

USPTO serial 74614841

TAX OPPORTUNITIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WEBER, BRIAN W
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TAX OPPORTUNITIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Karen Artz Ash

KAREN ARTZ ASH AMSTER, ROTHSTEIN & EBENSTEIN90 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10016UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software in the nature of programs containing information and articles about financial issues in an interactive magazine/newsletter format published online and on magnetic mediaABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 30, 1997JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 30, 1997EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 7, 1997ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 7, 1997EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Aug 8, 1996CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Jul 18, 1996JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 11, 1996CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Apr 3, 1996JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 24, 1996JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 23, 1996EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 31, 1995CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Sep 11, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 23, 1995CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 21, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 19, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 28, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 18, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance