USPTO serial 74614932
SECOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PESKA, KEVIN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SECOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Newport Beach, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Marguerite L. Gunn
MARGUERITE L GUNN KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR LLP2040 MAIN ST 14TH FLIRVINE, CA 92614UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | computer software, including software for use in building control security and building control systems; environmental control systems, including elevator control and monitoring, automatic lighting controls, environmental monitoring, energy management and control (HVAC), hazard detection systems; identification systems including fingerprint matching, photo identification, retinal scanning, and biometric identification systems; communications links for security monitoring; computer security systems; fire protection, detection and suppression systems; ATM security systems | ABANDONED | — |
| 037 | installation of security systems, installation of computer software and systems | ABANDONED | — |
| 039 | armored transport services | ABANDONED | — |
| 042 | commercial and residential security services; security systems, including closed circuit television (CCTV), electronic article protection, electronic article surveillance/anti-shoplifting systems (EAS), intrusion detection, burglar alarms, motions detectors, outdoor perimeter protection, outdoor lighting systems for use in perimeter control, and electronic parking lot controls; electronic access control (EAC); smart cards for EAC; monitoring of security systems; automotive security systems; vehicle locating systems; marine security systems; security guard services; convict monitoring systems and services; access control systems; personnel tracking and time and attendance tracking services | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 1996 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 30, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |