Drawing for MAI ARCHITECTS ENGINEERS PLANNERS

USPTO serial 74615110

MAI ARCHITECTS ENGINEERS PLANNERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MATTHEWS, AMOS
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MAI ARCHITECTS ENGINEERS PLANNERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Frank H. Andorka

FRANK H ANDORKA3200 NATIONAL CITY CTR1900 E 9TH STCLEVELAND, OH 44114-3404

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042architectural design services and engineering servicesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 14, 1997ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 23, 1997DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 12, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 12, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 17, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 9, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 6, 1996DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 30, 1995CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 30, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 10, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 8, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 28, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance