USPTO serial 74615162
RESPRO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 11, 1997
- Examiner
- MAYERSCHOFF, GLENN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with RESPRO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
London, GB
London SE1 0QR, GB
London SE1 0QR, GB
London SE1 0QR, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William C. Wright
William C. Wright Epstein Drangel LLP60 East 42nd Street, Suite 2520New York, NY 10165UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | safety products, namely, face shields, namely, pollution face masks and face scarves, reflective safety bands and stickers to be worn on the body, and reflective helmet skirts | ACTIVE | Sep 15, 1991 |
| 025 | high visibility jackets and coats that reflect light, and visors | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 15, 1991 |
| 028 | [ sport goggles to be used in motorcycling, bicycling, and skiing ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 15, 1991 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by COLE, HARRY
- Other trademarks owned by Renaissance Design Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Renaissance Design Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Renaissance Design Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named RESPRO
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2026 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 9, 2017 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2017 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 7, 2017 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2017 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| May 7, 2017 | 9G8P | REGISTERED - SEC. 9 GRANTED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8 | — |
| May 7, 2017 | 8PRT | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| May 5, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 13, 2017 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 20, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 20, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2011 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 4, 2011 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 28, 2007 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Apr 28, 2007 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Apr 10, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Mar 11, 2007 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Mar 11, 2007 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2004 | 8.PR | REGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 17, 2004 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 13, 2003 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Nov 7, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 14, 2003 | 8.AF | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED | — |
| Mar 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 1997 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 17, 1996 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 15, 1996 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 2, 1996 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 2, 1996 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 5, 1996 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 29, 1996 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 20, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 1996 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 1995 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 22, 1995 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 23, 1995 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 11, 1995 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |