Drawing for THE BEST SEAT IN THE HOUSE

USPTO serial 74615441

THE BEST SEAT IN THE HOUSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FERRAIUOLO, DOMINIC
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THE BEST SEAT IN THE HOUSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ernest I. Gifford

ERNEST I GIFFORD GIFFORD, KRASS, GROH, SPRINKLE, ET AL280 N WOODWARD AVE STE 400BIRMINGHAM, MI 48009-5394UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020furniture, namely, chairs and parts thereforABANDONEDNov 30, 1991

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 14, 1999JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 14, 1999EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jan 28, 1999ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jan 28, 1999EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Oct 22, 1997CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Sep 11, 1997JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 10, 1997EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 31, 1997CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 27, 1997CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 18, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 12, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 1995CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 25, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance