Drawing for INVISIBLE ANSWERING MACHINE

USPTO serial 74615475

INVISIBLE ANSWERING MACHINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BROWN, BARBARA TROFFKIN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with INVISIBLE ANSWERING MACHINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

James G. Coplit

JAMES G COPLIT GRIMES & BATTERSBYP O BOX 1311STAMFORD, CT 06904-1311UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038telecommunications services, namely, electronic voice messaging servicesACTIVEJul 31, 2000

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 19, 2001ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 23, 2000CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 21, 2000DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 15, 2000SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 22, 2000IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Dec 3, 1999EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 3, 1999EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jul 2, 1999EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jun 3, 1999EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Dec 28, 1998EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 3, 1998EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jun 30, 1998EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 3, 1998EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 16, 1998EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Nov 26, 1997EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 3, 1997NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 11, 1997PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 7, 1997NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 3, 1996CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 19, 1996CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 15, 1996CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 30, 1995CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 30, 1995CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 24, 1995DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance